DISCERNING THE DIFFERENCE
Readers respond to contributing editor Matt Kramer’s column “Differences of Magnitude” (online, Sept. 6) as he explains a wine critic’s approach to the subtle art of scoring wine.
Kramer] stated, “After tasting 200 or 500 Cabernets from a single vintage, it’s not that you’re bored, it’s that, often unconsciously, what to anyone else seems a small difference is precisely what captures your attention and excites you.” Would it not take some time to notice that difference, and are wines at the beginning of the tasting suffering from their place in the lineup? Had they been tasted later, might they have scored one or two points higher?
Jamie Sherman
Sacramento, Calif.
Matt Kramer responds:
Speaking only for myself, I can quantisay that unless it’s a category of wines…