SOMEONE ticked me off about last month’s editorial, which in part talked about hunting using thermal imagers. “That’s not hunting,” my accuser said, adding that no ethical hunter would consider using a thermal scope. I bristled!
“You reckon I’m not ethical?” I asked, insulted.
“No, no,” he said, trying to backtrack. I didn’t give him the chance.
I explained how I’d come to shoot the pig in the photo that ran with the editorial. I went out to where a pig might be, looked around, saw the pig, judged the wind, stalked to within sure hitting range, then shot it. Thermals or daylight, it would have played out exactly the same, only I didn’t have to worry as much about concealment.
“What’s unethical about that?” I asked.
“That’s a pig,”…
